Mark Meadows liked The Hatch Act, then came Trump

White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows doesn’t believe anyone in the U.S. is concerned about banning members of the Trump administration from engaging in political activities – or about breaking the law, especially during the Republican National Convention this week.

“No one outside the Beltway really cares – they hope Donald Trump is going to promote Republican values ​​and they hope he will do the same for Democrats when he takes over as Barack Obama,” Meadows told Politico on Wednesday morning. Calling.

But long before joining an administration known for its casual disregard for Hatch law, Meadows was one of the biggest proponents of federal law. Meadows co-sponsored multiple laws aimed at enforcing penalties for IDO violations, and was an investigator investigating hatch law violations desired by juvenile members of the Obama administration.

The change in position on the validity of the 60-year-old law coincides with the presence of a number of Trump administration officials on the RNC’s list of speakers. Conducting the event. Ethical observers have expressed concern that the event, which has been shown as part of its programming to government officials such as the naturalization program, is no less a political conference than a marathon of hat-trick violations with patriotic evictions.

Jordan LeBeauiz, communications director for Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, said “the government is a non-profit government that calls the head act a casual dismissal of Meadows.” Politics and government action remain separate. “

“Imagine going to a judge and dismissing allegations against them that ‘no one cares about drunken driving laws,'” Leibovits said.

Mados told Politico that the Hatch Act was outdated in the wake of the Carnavirus epidemic, which, he said, required the convention to be filmed on federal property.

“What it is actually designed to do is to make sure that I and other people do not use their political position to try to imply their political position to other employees, other federal employees, they need to vote the same way, register the same way or campaign.” One way to run, ”Meadows said Wednesday. “We accept it well beyond the original purpose of the Hatch Act.”

The features of the Maddox Hatch Act do not match the text of the law, which prohibits most federal employees from engaging in political activities in their governmental power, as well as the use of public funds for electoral purposes.

But Meadows felt a lot different when the Democrats were in power.

In 2014, as a member of the House of Representatives, Meadows denounced April Sands, a former federal election committee attorney who resigned after admitting to violating the Hatch Act by posting biased political messages in support of Obama’s re-election campaign, as well as a political F.C. Taken.

In the presence of Fox News, Meadows said of the case, “He had to resign and resign because of a violation of the Hatch Act.” It’s causing trouble. “

In 2001, Meadows co-sponsored legislation that, as part of the removal from federal service, sought to make violations of the Hatch Act subject to both civil and disciplinary action, including a five-year ban on federal employment for violators, and a $ 1,000 civil fine. Originally written to reform the investigation into retaliation against government whistle blowers, the bill was amended to include provisions related to the Hatch Act after proposing an amendment to the Meadows.

At the next Congress, he once again co-sponsored the Uniform Act.

The Trump administration did not share Meadows’ one-time urge to observe the Hatch Act. In June 2014, the Office of the Special Counsel in the United States found that White House Senior Counsel Kelly Conway had repeatedly violated the law alone, calling him a “repeat offender.”

“Convict violations, if released without punishment, send a message to all federal employees that they do not need to comply with the provisions of the Hatch Act,” Special Counsel Henry J. Carner wrote at the time.

Judging by Meadows by the response to the letter at the time, that message was received aloud.

“This investigation was a disaster,” Congressman Meadows said in response, immediately bringing charges against the Special Counsel’s Office for violating Conway’s “constitutional rights.” “They should be ashamed.”

Libiwitz said he took Meadows’ position in the White House, noting that while appearing on CREW Fox News, Hatch complained of blatant violations of the law’s chief of staff where he supported multiple Republican candidates for office.

Referring to Wolf’s participation in a naturalization program as part of the RNC’s official programming, Leibovits said, “Although the Trump administration has shown a complete disregard for ethics law, nothing has been more clear with Chad Wolf than last night.” “It’s such a blatant, blatant violation of the Hatch Act that the Trump administration seems to be on the verge of finding new ways to violate the law.”

House Democrats have promised to investigate alleged hatch law violations in the RNC. During a video press briefing with reporters on Tuesday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called those involved in politicizing their government power “so immoral.”

“The American people … they know these people are immoral and illegal and working outside the law,” Pelosi said.

– With additional reports by Hunter Udal


Leave a Comment